Trivia is more than a game; it’s a global tradition of knowledge and competition. Masters of Trivia’s tournaments have gone live, with 30 fast, multiple-choice questions. Most correct wins. Speed breaks ties. Compete worldwide for a $MOT token prize purse, plus valuable in-kind prizes.

Get the entry link and reminders by email — subscribe free at PlayMOT.

London, England
20 years ago

On the morning of July 7, 2005, four British Islamist extremists carried out coordinated suicide bombings on London's public transport system during the morning rush hour. Three of them detonated homemade bombs aboard London Underground trains within fifty seconds of each other at around 8:50 a.m. — near Aldgate, at Edgware Road, and near Russell Square. Almost an hour later, at 9:47 a.m., the fourth bomber detonated his device on the upper deck of a number 30 double-decker bus in Tavistock Square. Fifty-two people were killed, in addition to the four bombers, and nearly 800 were injured.

The attacks were the deadliest terrorist incident on British soil since the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, and the first Islamist suicide attack in the country's history. They came the day after London had been awarded the 2012 Olympic Games, and while the G8 summit was meeting in Scotland — a juxtaposition of celebration and atrocity that defined the national mood.

The four bombers — Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Germaine Lindsay, and Hasib Hussain — were British residents, three of them born in the United Kingdom. The discovery that the attackers were 'homegrown' — radicalized within Britain rather than infiltrated from abroad — was profoundly unsettling and reshaped counter-terrorism strategy. The bombs were made from concentrated hydrogen peroxide and other readily available materials, packed into backpacks. The attackers had recorded 'martyrdom videos' citing British foreign policy in Iraq and Afghanistan as justification.

The response of London's emergency services and ordinary citizens became a point of national pride. Doctors from the nearby British Medical Association headquarters rushed to treat the wounded at Tavistock Square. Underground staff, transport workers, and passersby assisted in evacuations and first aid. The phrase 'we are not afraid' and the broader spirit of London 'carrying on' became a defining narrative of the response — a deliberate refusal to allow the attacks to alter the rhythms of the city.

The attacks had lasting consequences for British society and security policy. They intensified debates about multiculturalism, integration, and radicalization; led to expanded surveillance and counter-terrorism powers; and contributed to ongoing tensions around British Muslim communities. Two weeks later, on July 21, a second group of would-be bombers attempted a near-identical attack that failed when their devices did not properly detonate. In the tense aftermath, police shot and killed an innocent Brazilian man, Jean Charles de Menezes, whom they mistook for a bomber — a tragedy that became its own lasting controversy.

On July 7, 2005, four British men killed 52 people on London's trains and buses during the morning commute. They had been born and raised in Britain. The discovery rewrote the rules of counter-terrorism, and London's response — refusing to be afraid — became the defining narrative of the day.

How much do you know about the 7/7 London bombings, the homegrown nature of the attackers, the response of the city's emergency services, and the lasting effects on British security policy?