Sponsored by
Protection for Birds, a Gift for You
Snowy Owl. Photo: Grant Eldridge/Audubon Photography Awards
Since 1970, we have lost 3 billion birds in North America. Birds like the Snowy Owl are at increasing risk of extinction due to climate change. Birds are vital to healthy ecosystems - and their decline affects us all.
With over a century of conservation expertise, the National Audubon Society knows what it takes to protect the birds we love. And with your support today, we can.
Join us in protecting birds with a dependable, annual gift and we’ll send you our quarterly, award-winning magazine every year as our thanks.
A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR, MASTERS OF TRIVIA
Trivia is more than a game; it’s a global tradition of knowledge and competition. Masters of Trivia’s tournaments have gone live, with 30 fast, multiple-choice questions. Most correct wins. Speed breaks ties. Compete worldwide for a $MOT token prize purse, plus valuable in-kind prizes.
Get the entry link and reminders by email — subscribe free at PlayMOT.
—— ON THIS DAY ——
MAY 11, 1997
New York City, USA
29 years ago
Garry Kasparov, then the reigning world chess champion and widely considered the greatest player in history, facing the IBM supercomputer Deep Blue in their 1997 rematch in New York.
On May 11, 1997, the IBM supercomputer Deep Blue defeated world chess champion Garry Kasparov in the sixth and final game of their rematch match, winning the series 3.5 to 2.5. It was the first time a computer had defeated a reigning world chess champion in a classical match under standard tournament conditions. Kasparov had been considered the greatest chess player of all time. He had beaten an earlier version of Deep Blue in a six-game match the previous year.
The rematch in May 1997 attracted global attention of a kind that chess had not seen in decades. IBM used it as a test and a showcase for its artificial intelligence research; the press treated it as a contest between human and machine intelligence; philosophers and computer scientists debated what a victory by either side would actually prove. Deep Blue won Game 2 in a way that Kasparov found inexplicable — a subtle strategic move that seemed beyond the program's known capabilities — and never fully recovered psychologically.
—— MARQUEE EVENT ——
Deep Blue — the IBM supercomputer that defeated Kasparov in 1997, capable of evaluating 200 million chess positions per second.
Kasparov's accusation that IBM had cheated — specifically, that a human grandmaster had provided input between moves in Game 2 — was investigated and denied. IBM refused to provide the complete move logs to Kasparov or independent analysts. The controversy was never fully resolved. IBM retired Deep Blue immediately after the match, without playing another series, which deepened suspicions. Kasparov requested a rematch. IBM declined. Deep Blue was disassembled.
What Deep Blue actually demonstrated was the power of brute-force computation applied to a well-defined problem with clear rules and a finite number of positions. It evaluated two hundred million positions per second. It did not 'understand' chess in any meaningful sense — it had no concept of beauty, no appreciation of a clever combination, no sense of what was at stake. It searched, it evaluated, and it chose. For the specific purpose of winning chess games, this was enough to defeat the best human who had ever played.
The match's significance in the history of artificial intelligence has been debated ever since. For some researchers, it proved that intelligence is essentially computation — that given enough processing power and good algorithms, machines could surpass humans at any cognitive task. For others, it proved the opposite: that chess, despite its complexity, was a narrow, rule-bound problem that computers could solve by brute force without anything resembling genuine intelligence. The question of what intelligence actually is — and whether machines can possess it — was not answered in May 1997. It is still not answered.
—— WHY THIS MATTERS ——
The Deep Blue victory was the first major public demonstration that machines could surpass humans at a prestigious intellectual task. Before 1997, chess mastery was considered a hallmark of human intelligence. After 1997, it was a solved problem. The psychological and philosophical reverberations shaped how the following decades approached artificial intelligence.
The match inaugurated the modern era of AI benchmarking against human performance. From chess, researchers moved to Go (Google DeepMind's AlphaGo, 2016), to natural language (IBM Watson, Jeopardy!, 2011), to protein folding (AlphaFold, 2020). Each victory raised the same question: what, exactly, does this tell us about intelligence?
The controversy over Deep Blue's Game 2 move has never been definitively resolved. IBM's refusal to release complete logs and its immediate retirement of Deep Blue left enough ambiguity that the match's historical clean narrative — machine beats man, end of story — is murkier than it appears. The full record may never be available.
—— THE TAKEAWAY ——
On May 11, 1997, a supercomputer defeated the greatest chess player who had ever lived in a game of pure intellect. It evaluated two hundred million positions per second and had no idea it had won. The question of what that proved about intelligence — human or artificial — has been argued ever since.
—— QUOTE OF THE DAY ——
"Deep Blue doesn't have a heart, it doesn't have a soul, and it doesn't have any emotions. And that's what makes it so frightening."
— Garry Kasparov, following his defeat by Deep Blue, May 1997
—— OUR QUIZ OF THE DAY ——
How much do you know about Deep Blue, Garry Kasparov, the 1997 rematch, the brute-force vs. intelligence debate, and what the match did and didn't prove about the future of artificial intelligence?
