AI Is Moving Fast. Here's How to Keep Up.
AI is moving faster than any other technology. New models. New tools. New claims. New noise.
Most people feel like they're behind. But the people that don't, aren't smarter. They're just better informed.
The Future Today is a daily briefing for people who want clarity. In one concise email each day, you'll get the most important AI and tech developments, learn why they matter, and what they signal about what's coming next.
Written for operators, builders, leaders, and anyone who wants to sound sharp when AI comes up in the meeting.
One email. Five Minutes. Stay ahead of 99% of the world.
A WORD FROM OUR SPONSOR, MASTERS OF TRIVIA
Trivia is more than a game; it’s a global tradition of knowledge and competition. Masters of Trivia’s tournaments have gone live, with 30 fast, multiple-choice questions. Most correct wins. Speed breaks ties. Compete worldwide for a $MOT token prize purse, plus valuable in-kind prizes.
Get the entry link and reminders by email — subscribe free at PlayMOT.
—— ON THIS DAY ——
AUGUST 23, 1927
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
99 years ago
Just after midnight on August 23, 1927, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were put to death in the electric chair at a prison in Massachusetts. The two Italian immigrants and anarchists had been convicted of murdering a paymaster and a guard during an armed robbery in 1920. For seven years their case had been the subject of appeals, protests, and international outcry, and their execution, carried out despite worldwide demonstrations pleading for their lives, sent a shock through much of the world.
The two men had been arrested in the aftermath of the robbery, and though both carried guns and gave misleading statements, neither had a criminal record. Their trial in 1921 took place at the height of the Red Scare, a period of intense American hostility toward immigrants, radicals, and anarchists. Many observers came to believe that Sacco and Vanzetti had been convicted less for the evidence against them than for who they were: foreign, poor, and politically radical.
—— MARQUEE EVENT ——
The case against the two men was widely seen as flawed. The stolen money was never recovered, key evidence was later discredited, and the presiding judge was reported to have made prejudiced remarks about the defendants outside the courtroom. In 1925 another man, already convicted of a separate murder, confessed to having taken part in the robbery with a known gang, but the courts refused to reopen the case. The appeals failed, and clemency was denied.
As the execution approached, protests erupted in cities across the world. Demonstrators gathered in Europe, Latin America, and across the United States; the case inspired writers, artists, and intellectuals; and bombs were even set off in American cities. To many, Sacco and Vanzetti had become symbols of a justice system that punished people for their origins and their politics rather than their proven deeds. Their own eloquent professions of innocence, in letters that were widely published, deepened the sense of tragedy.
The debate over their guilt has never been fully settled. A ballistics test decades later suggested that one of the guns may indeed have been used in the crime, though questions about the evidence remain. But the deeper controversy was always about the fairness of the trial rather than the ultimate truth of the verdict. Fifty years after the executions, the governor of Massachusetts issued a proclamation declaring that the two men had been unfairly tried and that any stigma should be removed from their names. The case remains a lasting warning about how prejudice can corrupt the pursuit of justice.
—— WHY THIS MATTERS ——
The case became a global symbol of injustice. The trial and execution, widely seen as driven by prejudice against immigrants and radicals, provoked protests around the world and came to represent the fear that justice could be corrupted by bias against the marginalized.
It exposed the dangers of the Red Scare atmosphere. Conducted at the height of American hostility toward immigrants and anarchists, the trial demonstrated how a climate of fear could shape a courtroom, punishing defendants for their origins and beliefs as much as for any proven act.
It remains a lasting warning about the fragility of justice. Fifty years later, the state itself acknowledged that the two men had been unfairly tried. The case endures as a study in how prejudice can distort legal proceedings and how difficult it is to undo an injustice once carried out.
—— THE TAKEAWAY ——
Just after midnight on August 23, 1927, Sacco and Vanzetti died in the electric chair, despite protests across the world, after a trial widely condemned as unfair. Two immigrant anarchists became a lasting symbol of how prejudice can corrupt justice. Fifty years on, the state admitted they had not been fairly tried.
—— QUOTE OF THE DAY ——
“I am suffering because I am a radical and indeed I am a radical; I have suffered because I was an Italian.”
— Bartolomeo Vanzetti, in a statement before his execution
—— OUR QUIZ OF THE DAY ——
How much do you know about the Sacco and Vanzetti case, the Red Scare that surrounded it, the flaws in the trial, and the worldwide protests it provoked?





